Review defects and losses
Compare records by period, product and process
Quality Intelligence
From defect records to the quality work that needs attention first.
Review defect trends, losses and inspection evidence, then organize improvement priorities and follow-up work. Support the decision on what to address, not only the counting of inspections.
What the team receives
Prioritize the work
Review recurrence and impact
Connect the action and assignee
Organize the subject, responsible person and next action
Verify and revisit
Check the outcome and subsequent recurrence
A functional prototype is available. Rules, data connections and follow-up scope require configuration and validation against the customer’s quality process. This is not automatic root-cause confirmation or unreviewed equipment control.
Inspection records provide evidence for quality decisions.
Capture, judgment and counts are inputs to quality work. The animation illustrates inspection input, not an actual defect trend or live engine result.
Workflow illustration. Fixed numbers explain the example; they are not measured results.
1 · CAPTURE + EVIDENCE
LOT · CAPTURE TIME
→
2 · OK / NG VERDICT
MANUAL VERDICTOKNG
→
3 · DASHBOARD COUNTS
TOTAL 240OK 236NG 4
Technical structure and detailed conditions
Flowmatic Quality status
Working prototype · integration ·next validation
Quality Worklist is working; Inspection-result integration and field reference-data validation are next.
Working prototype
- Defect, loss, and priority structure
- Improvement worklist
- Effect verification and recurrence state
Evidence / input layer
- Inspection evidence
- Item, LOT, cause, and period context
Integration in progress
- Inspection-result integration
- Field data and reference-price provenance checks